Friday, November 15, 2013

Happily Practicing the Way (Tao) While Living in the Mundane World


"Happily Practicing the Way (Tao) While Living in the Mundane World" (Cư Trần Lạc Đạo) is a prose essay by King Tran Nhan Tong (Truc Lam The Great Ascetic Hermit).  It is the first essay in Old Vietnamese (tiếng Nôm).  It consists of eight paragraphs which explain the heart of the Great Hermit's method of mind training.  
The First Paragraph
While my body is dwelling in the city, my living style is that of those living in the wilderness.  When all the karmas (committed by the body, in words, and in thoughts) are subdued/pacified, both the outward expressions and the inner nature become calm.  As a result, it takes only half a day to practice in peace, and both the body and the mind are under control. 
When the spring of lust ceases, my mind is no longer bothered by love or desire; once arguments about rights and wrongs stop, I can enjoy the beautiful songs by swallows and thrushes.  
Many feel contented when they are traveling and seeking quietism among wild rivers and green mountains, but among them is there any who is able to see the nature of green foliage and pink roses?
The images of blue skies and a silver moon shine upon all flowing Zen rivers, while the wisdom sun extends its radiation over innumerable gentle willows and fresh flowers.
Those who practice mystical methods may want to transform their bodies and to transcend this world; they then are trying hard with alchemy in search of a rare potion for an eternal life in the upper realm of heaven.  On the other hand, Buddhist followers simply love to read sutras and treatises, as they consider a simple and free-from-fetters life much more valuable than gold and jewels.   

(to be continued) 

Sources: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tran_Nhan_Tong
http://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tr%E1%BA%A7n_Nh%C3%A2n_T%C3%B4ng
http://thuvienhoasen.org/D_1-2_2-137_4-19440_5-50_6-2_17-68_14-1_15-1/#nl_detail_bookmark 

Saturday, October 19, 2013

Some Remarks About General Vo Nguyen Giap’s Death and Its Aftereffect


For over two weeks since General Vo Nguyen Giap passed away on Oct 4, 2013, there have been heated discussions about his life and influence in Vietnam and in the world.  Why such a phenomenon?  Following are just a few remarks from one personal perspective.
There are different opinions about General Giap, his character, his roles during the wars and in peace, and his influence or legacy for future generations in Vietnam.  Depending on the individual’s sociopolitical stance, we can notice two main contrasting views:  
1. He is considered a talented military leader and a national hero, even a saint or idol in Vietnam history.  People compare him to legendary heroes and founding fathers in Vietnam history such as Ly Thuong Kiet, Tran Hung Dao, Nguyen Trai….  The whole nation and many Vietnamese communities in the world mourned him at such a high level as found only at the funerals of great Vietnamese historic figures like Phan Chu Trinh, Ho Chi Minh….  He is looked up as a beloved and a genuine nationalist, an excellent follower of Ho Chi Minh, and one of the founders of Vietnam after 1945.  Without him, there would not have been the decisive victory at Dien Bien Phu, which forced the French colonialists to withdraw from Vietnam in 1954.  He was also instrumental in building up the Vietnamese People’s Army from its first blueprint as "armed propaganda brigades" in 1944 with only 34 people.  No one denied his role as Commander in Chief throughout the war against the US, even though, with Le Duan and Van Tien Dung’s presence in South Vietnam, he had no longer directed southern operations since 1972. 
Crowds of people, children and youth born in peace times as well as old veterans in remote areas from the North to the South, tried all they could to come to Hanoi or Quang Binh to pay tribute to the famous  General.  During his funeral procession from his house in Hanoi to his burial place in Vung Chua, Quang Binh (a distance of 437km), despite the scorching sun, a sea of people waited in long lines wherever possible to show their admiration and respect to him the last time.  Many could not hold back their emotions, including soldiers in duty at his burial site.  
2. On the other side, his enemies regard him as a merciless general towards his own soldiers and towards prisoners of war at the front.  To them he only focused on the final victory, and never concerned about the high price Vietnam had to pay for the prolonged wars in terms of human lives and national economic and cultural developments.  Those who are against the current regime in Vietnam have exploited his image and his death as the last glowing vestiges during the sunset of communism in the region and in the world.  Protesters against the Vietnam Communist Party and current government leaders think he remained a powerless weakling silently pushed aside by his comrades (Le Duan, Le Duc Tho, Le Duc Anh ….) from 1960s through1980s.  Democratic activists and political reformers consider him a respected but too defensive patriot after the war.  Despite his talents and wise vision, they think he had no significant roles or contributions after April 30, 1975.  Those advocating for a peaceful transition into a new democratic Vietnam regret losing him as an intellectual supporter for their movements. 

All comments and criticisms aside, General Giap remains a historic Vietnamese figure with a huge and lasting influence and a unique legacy in national and international history.
At the national level, to younger generations he left a legacy of an idealistic character with his honesty, integrity and consistency in serving the nation.  He was faithful to his ideal and the national cause till the end of his life.  Throughout his life he continued to share his visions in many national issues with government leaders and his people during wartime (Dien bien Phu 1954, Tet Offensive 1968, Summer 1972, Spring 1975, the war against China in 1979, Central Highlands and the Paracel Islands and Spratly Islands since 1990s) and in peace (land reforms in the 1950s, and current problems about national security, educational, scientific and economic development, policies about oceanic research, boxite extraction, etc.).  These are pragmatic lessons for political and military leaders to study and apply.  His pragmatism, responsibility and discipline are models for good leadership.  In adversities, his open-mindedness, tolerance and empathy, and especially his wise tactics in dealing with internal and external affairs should be thought-provoking to political leaders, including those against him. 
At the international level, he has been admired and respected by both his former enemies, fighters in movements for national liberation and independence, and peace-loving people around the world.  Among foreigners attending his funeral were US veterans and peace-loving fighters.  Politicians from France and the USA all expressed their respects and sorrows at his death.  He is always an inspiring fighter for national liberation against foreign aggression.   His books on war tactics and strategies have been translated into many languages and are currently used in military academies in many countries. 
The General’s long-lasting legacy and final message to both the Vietnamese people and current government leaders was probably his decision about his burial place.  With this last choice he seemed to imply that as a son of his homeland fighting for his national independence, at the end of his life, he wanted to be buried like other ordinary soldiers and citizens in his own homeland.  Many years before his death he had chosen a burial place in a remote area close to high mountains looking toward the vast sea.  It is located at Vung Chua-Dao Yen, Quang Binh Province, the narrowest and the poorest region in northern Central Vietnam.  It is so remote that there is almost no decent road to get access to this burial place for a well-known historic figure like him.  Until the day before his funeral, many soldiers and workers had to work hard to build the road to welcome the hero back to his homeland.  The week before his death, the region and its neighboring areas in Central Vietnam had been struck by a seasonal typhoon, which flooded a huge area and killed many villagers.  The General lived and died with his people, and he remained faithful to the ideal of the Vietnamese People's Army to the end of his life.  That is why he chose not to be buried in Mai Dich Cemetary, where selected Communist Party and government leaders were often buried. 

One important question remains: “Why so many Vietnamese people mourned General Giap?”  When asked about the reasons of their emotional behaviors, many sincerely expressed their deep respect toward him.  To them, he was a faithful and dedicated public servant with high dignity, honesty, and integrity till the end of his life.  He was a simple person with an exemplary life and character that they truly admire and love.  Moreover, he belonged to the long-gone generations of high-minded people who out of patriotism had joined and had been trained in the wars for national liberation and reunification.  It is possible that the people have a strong need to express their patriotism and personal emotions toward a legendary figure who passed away at a time when Vietnam and many of its traditional values seem to be quite vulnerable.  Attending his funeral is a legitimate and politically-safe way for the people to express their desires, aspirations and concerns toward the future of their nation, and to send a strong protest message against many corrupted  leaders at all levels.  What the Vietnamese people desire at present is honesty and transparency from their leaders, and a civic society with freedom and democracy in which the people’s voice is well respected and listened to attentively.  When they mourned General Giap, they also mourned for themselves, and for the betrayal of current leaders against the national ideals that many generations had sacrificed their youth and lives fighting for.   Their mourning is fundamentally an expression of concerns and sorrows for the gloomy future of their nation.

Related Sources:

Documentaries about General Vo Nguyen Giap
1-Duong Kach Menh/The Revolutionary Way
2 Tu nhan dan ma ra/Born from the People
3 Chin nam lam mot Dien Bien/ The Nine-Year Making of Dien Bien Phu
4 Cuoc dung dau lich su/ A Historic Encounter
5Tien len toan thang at ve ta/Forward and the Victory is Ours
6 Nguoi anh ca cua Quan doi Nhan dan VN/The Eldest Brother of the Vietnamese People's Army
Wiki
http://dantri.com.vn/su-kien/bao-gioi-quoc-te-boi-hoi-truoc-le-tang-dai-tuong-vo-nguyen-giap-789379.htm
  
Anh Vuong Ngo.  Tolerance Helped the General to Overcome Life Adversities.  Oct 14, 2013 
Duong Que Pham.  Ups and Downs (Waves and Winds) in General Giap’s Life
General’s Giap’s last letter to businessmen and women. Read by Quoc Trung Duong on Oct. 6, 2013 at the Club of Vietnamese Industrialists and Businessmen and Businesswomen
http://infonet.vn/Kinh-doanh/Doanh-nghiep/Buc-thu-cuoi-cung-cua-Dai-tuong-Vo-Nguyen-Giap/114292.info


Hang Lien Nguyen.  The Gaps in General Giap’s Life
http://www.bbc.co.uk/vietnamese/forum/2013/10/131013_nguyenlienhang_view_on_gen_giap.shtml
Larry Berman.  General Giap Understands His Enemies
http://www.thanhnien.com.vn/pages/20131007/giao-su-su-hoc-my-larry-berman-dai-tuong-vo-nguyen-giap-hieu-ro-ke-thu.aspx

Meeting between General Giap and McNamara

http://news.zing.vn/Cuoc-gap-an-tuong-cua-tuong-Giap-va-McNamara-post346517.html.

Office of General Vo Nguyen Giap- Some Memories

Saturday, October 12, 2013

When the General Passed Away


                                                       
The General is lying there 
Motionless and speechless
Having done what must be done
He passed away in peace
Nothing to attach
Nobody to blame

The General left with only one simple wish:
To return to his old village
Where there are poor peasants
“Quang Binh My Birthplace!”*
Where water is everywhere
and the land is filled with love for the vast sea
“Quang Binh My Birthplace!”

When the General passed away
His heart and mind was upon
Returning to where his ancestors had lived
Like the Gianh River
After years and years flowing on foreign lands
In the end it always pours into the vast sea

Where he was born
Is where he would return.

The General did not go away;
He has returned
to live in his people’s sea womb.


Oct 12, 2013
---------
* The title of a song General Vo Nguyen Giap would listen to during his last days.

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Tolerance –Part II


A tolerant person must have empathy and compassion towards other beings.  Empathy means sincerely understanding others’ feelings and thinking, and truly sharing their pains, frustration, and anger, as well as their perceptions and beliefs.  Compassion implies boundless and unconditioned love expressed through concerned attitudes, kind words and caring deeds.   A compassionate person is selfless and altruistic.
To develop empathy and compassion, every day try to put ourselves in the shoes of those who are sick or in pain and need care, and those who seem to be difficult to deal with.  Imagine you are a caregiver, learn how to express your empathy toward them.  Take care of others, including little creatures like an ant, a mosquito, or an earthworm.  Cause no harm to others, and learn to become a vegetarian.  Put yourself in others' situations in order to empathize with those who are quarrelsome and bellicose.  Learn why they live and view the world that way.  You can develop empathy by thinking about the interconnectedness among all beings on earth.  Oneness embraces no discrimination, prejudice or stereotype.  Thinking about unity or oneness, you would not utter unskilled words that may hurt or separate people.  Nor would you want to harm any when you see yourselves in others.  With compassion you would rather give than receive, whether it is material objects and money, or joy and happiness.  Compassionate people always help others in difficult times without any selfish motive.  Empathy and compassion should be subjects for daily mindful contemplation.  With practice, patience and perseverance, your ability to tolerate adversities will improve.




Sunday, September 8, 2013

Tolerance

Tolerance is a powerful means to conquer all oppositions, obstacles and adversaries in life, but it is not easy to practice.   

Wars and conflicts among countries, religions, and various groups show that dialogues and negotiations are usually helpless, even useless to solve differences.  The roots of the problem of differences lie in human ignorance, hatred and greed.  To solve the problem, therefore, we need to uproot or transform these human illnesses.  One possible solution is to practice tolerance by taming the mind.  This is a huge task for each of us, at the individual level.  

The practice of tolerance demands a strong will and an selfless desire to improve oneself and the world around us.  Discipline and effort are necessary for this tolerance training.  Every second in daily life the practitioner needs to observe his/her body and verbal behaviors,as well as emotional and mental states or perceptions.  Together with the practice of no discrimination based on an understanding of the interconnectedness in the universe, a boundless love to others, and, most importantly, the practice of no self, the practitioner will gradually increase his/her ability to tolerate.  This is one goal of true meditation.   

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Lincoln on Government


Lincoln’s belief that “joint effort” or “combined action” by government was required to help the weakest members of society.  Five years later he would admit that “government is not charged with the duty of redressing or preventing all the wrongs in the world,” but he added: “Government rightfully may, and…ought to, redress all wrongs which are wrongs to the nation itself.”

The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but cannot do, at all, or cannot, so well do, for themselves— in their separate, and individual capacities.
In all that the people can individually do as well for themselves. Government ought not to interfere.
-----
The desirable things which the individuals of a people cannot do, or cannot well do, for themselves, fall into two classes: those which have relations to wrongs, and those which have not.  Each of these branch off into an infinite variety of subdivisions.
The first—that in relation to wrongs—embraces all crimes, misdemeanors, and non-performance of contracts.  The other embraces all which, in its nature, and without wrong, requires combined action, as public roads and highways, public schools, charities, pauperism, orphanage, estates of the deceased,  and the machinery of government itself. 
From this it appears that if all men were just, there still would be some, though not so much, need of government.
------
Government is a combination of the people of a country to effect certain objects by joint effort.  The best framed and best administered governments are necessarily expensive; while by errors in frame and maladministration most of them are more onerous than they need be, and some of them very oppressive.  Why, then, should we have government?  Why not each individual take to himself the whole fruit of his labor, without having any of it taxed away, in services, corn, or money?  Why not take just so much land as he can cultivate with his own hands, without buying it of any one?
The legitimate object of government is “to do for the people what needs to be done, but which they cannot, by individual effort, do at all, or do so well, for themselves. “  There are many such things—some of them exist independently of the injustice in the world.  Making and maintaining roads, bridges, and the like; providing for the helpless young and afflicted; common schools; and discomposing of deceased men’s property, are instances.
But a far larger class of objects springs from the injustice of men.  If one people will make war upon another, it is necessary with that other to unite and cooperate for defense.  Hence the military department.  If some men will kill, or beat, or constrain others, or despoil them of property, by force, fraud, or noncompliance with contracts, it is a common object with peaceful and just men to prevent it.  Hence the criminal and civil departments.

Source:

To Do for the People What Needs to Be Done, Fragments on Government
[July 1, 1854] in Lincoln on Democracy:  His Own Words, with Essays by America's Foremost Civil War Historians. (New York, NY: A Cornelia & Michael Bessie Book, HarperCollins Publishers, 1990).  Eds. Mario M. Cuomo, & Harold Holzer, pp. 63-65.

Sunday, August 4, 2013

Critical Thinking and Information Evaluation - An Old Topic To Be Revisited Several Times

We need to train children how to think independently and critically, because this is a survival skill in the Information Age. Such a training can be introduced early, possibly during kindergarten years through daily practice with the simple question-and-answer method. Do not ask children to follow or accept anything blindly and passively. Instead, encourage them to ask and answer questions about new things and events they encounter every day. Then allow them to test and see the result for themselves. In other words, kindle their curiosity, let them think, explore, get actual experiences, and evaluate the experiences by themselves under some guidance. In that way they can learn effectively.

As children grow up, they need to know how to hone their skills of observation, evaluation and judgment. One of the best ways to teach children critical thinking during their elementary years is to ask them to read, and to keep a journal (diary) to record their feelings and thoughts about what they have just read, and about their daily life at home and in school. Compare and contrast what they read with what they observe and experience in real life.  That is a good starting point to develop keen observation, critical thinking, and also meta-cognition, all of which are essential for scientific inquiry later on.

Children need encouragements and feed backs about what they have accomplished. Therefore, responsible adults (i.e., parents and teachers) should read the children's journal entries with them, and provide some positive feed backs and comments. Children need someone to listen to them and to provide them with guidelines.

In the Information Age, children need guidelines regarding Internet and information use and usage. Without responsible adults' guidance, children might become vulnerable victims of Internet crimes, or unintentionally get confused about values. They may even get the wrong messages about life values. Children, therefore, need to be taught information evaluation as early as first grade, or even earlier. Learning values, life skills, and information use and evaluation is a must through all school years, and even beyond.

Most Webpages found from search engines are self-published with some motives. Even Webpages by well-known national or international institutions, organizations and government agencies may have flaws or errors which the organizations, institutions or agencies might have overlooked. That is why Web users need to cultivate critical thinking and healthy skepticism.

Besides knowing your own topic and searching purpose (What information you look for and why you need it), you may rely on some of the following evaluation criteria to decide whether or not you should use the information you found:

1. Authority: What is the original source of information? Who is the author?  His/Her credentials? Is s/he an authority on the topic?
2. Currency: When was it first published or last updated?
3. Reliability and verifiability: Any bibliography, documentation, or additional links to resources to authenticate the information?  Is the image/the video clip/the sound authentic, or is it manipulated, distorted intentionally?  Photoshop has been doing a marvelous job in manipulating information.
4. Point of view or bias: What point of view does the author represent? Conservative or progressive, or affiliated with some advocacy group?  Read between the lines. 
5. Appropriateness and Coverage: The scope (breadth and depth) of the information item, and whether it meets your search purpose.

Finally, don't hastily share the information to others without checking it first. It is better to compare, contrast, and use many sources on the topic before you decide if the information item you have found meets your information purpose.

Information and technology alone cannot save the world.  Only TRUTH and WISDOM can  better the world.



Resources:

http://olinuris.library.cornell.edu/ref/research/webeval.html
http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/instruct/guides/evaluation.html
http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/Evaluate.html
http://www.library.jhu.edu/researchhelp/general/evaluating